Passive Exposure to Pollutants from a New Generation of Cigarettes in Real Life Scenarios

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heat-not-burn tobacco (HNBT), as popular nicotine delivery systems (NDS), has increased among adult demographics. This study aims to assess the effects on indoor air quality of traditional tobacco cigarettes (TCs) and new smoking alternatives, to determine the differences between their potential impacts on human health. Measurements of particulate matter (PM₁, PM_2.5 and PM₁₀), black carbon, carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) were performed in two real life scenarios, in the home and in the car. The results indicated that the particle emissions from the different NDS devices were significantly different. In the home and car, the use of TCs resulted in higher PM₁₀ and ultrafine particle concentrations than when e-cigarettes were smoked, while the lowest concentrations were associated with HNBT. As black carbon and CO are released by combustion processes, the concentrations of these two pollutants were significantly lower for e-cigarettes and HNBT because no combustion occurs when they are smoked. CO₂ showed no increase directly associated with the NDS but a trend linked to a higher respiration rate connected with smoking. The results showed that although the levels of pollutants emitted by e-cigarettes and HNBT are substantially lower compared to those from TCs, the new smoking devices are still a source of indoor air pollutants.

Main findings: Although levels of pollutants emitted by e-cigarettes and HNBT are substantially lower compared to those from TCs, the new smoking devices are still a source of indoor air pollutants.

Type of publication: Scientific article published at International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Open Access)

How to cite: Savdie J., Canha N., Buitrago N., Almeida S.M. (2020) Passive Exposure to Pollutants from a New Generation of Cigarettes in Real Life Scenarios. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(10), 3455. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103455

How to download: here